Page 180 - CW E-Magazine (17-12-2024)
P. 180

Special Report                                                                                                                                                                   Special Report


       seek M&A opportunities if they are to  arrangements when entering new   increased their exposure to sustainability    Green hydrogen: Gaining traction for energy transition
       remain competitive and achieve reliabi-  markets or customer segments. In   and the circular economy. To remain
       lity of supply and lower costs. As they  addition, they should prioritize:   competitive, other companies need to   in India
       consider potential targets, they need to                           follow suit – and developing an effec-
       ask themselves the following questions:  *  Adopting  flexible  investment  strate-  tive TSR strategy is a vital first step.
       Which segments and regions are most   gies  and  selectively  investing  in                                   SYNOPSIS                          transmission charges (ISTS) for renew-  CareEdge Ratings
       critical to driving our TSR? Should the   key areas to maximize returns,   Acknowledgments                          he  momentum  of  Green  Hydro-  able power, and it remains a key barrier
       company focus on fewer steps within the   while  also  maintaining  flexible   The authors acknowledge the          gen (GH2) in India will be driven  to  the  viability  and  widespread  adop-  estimated at $3.74 per kg as of CY23.
       value chain or on more steps – for ex-  make/buy strategies in their value   contributions of their BCG colleagues   Tby lower renewable energy  tion of GH2.                     In the years ahead, CareEgde Ratings
       ample, by creating joint ventures, selling   chain operations.     Kanishka  Agarwal,  Jooyoung  Ahn,         costs and India’s decarbonisation goals.                            opines that reduction in electrolyser
       or acquiring businesses, and purchasing                            Robert Blaudeck, Prakash Chandrasekar,     The  prevailing  levelised  cost  of  GH2   Besides,  as  per  CareEdge  Ratings,  cost  and  effi ciency  improvement  are
       intermediates (from players with a cost   *  Utilizing robust project manage-  Christoph  Franck,  Jan  Friese,  Amit   (LCOH)  stands  at  ~1.75x  times  and  a  signifi cant  capex  outlay  of  Rs.2.40  prerequisites to achieve a targeted leve-
       advantage in other regions) rather than   ment  capabilities,  effective  deci-  Gandhi, Abhrajit Guria, Susumu Hattori,   ~1.50x times higher than that of grey  lakh-crore is required to produce 1-mt  lised cost of $2.1 per kg. Additionally,
       producing them in-house?            sion-making processes, and strong  Jingshi  Hu,  Ryan  Jones,  Jihoon  Kim,   and brown hydrogen respectively, pos-  of  GH2.  Capex  for  renewable  energy  Production  Linked  Incentives  (PLIs)
                                           controls and  reporting  systems  to  Livia  Lin,  Martin  Link,  Julia  Meisel,   ing a signifi cant barrier to its adoption.  generation  and capex for electrolyser  announced  by  the  Government  of
          Smart  deal-making  and  portfolio   ensure they make the right invest-  Marcus Morawietz, Eduard Pujol, Arun   Economic viability of GH2 requires a  are the two major cost components with  India (GoI), such as a direct production
       management involves:                ment decisions and achieve rigor-  Rajamani,  Katarzyna  Raszka,  Adam    35-40% drop in electrolyser prices and  an estimated contribution of 48% and  incentive of up to $0.50/kg of GH2 pro-
                                           ous execution, thereby helping to  Rothman, Mirko Rubeis, Ranu Sharma,    a  12-14%  improvement  in  effi ciency,  34% respectively in the overall cost of  duction for the fi rst two years and an
       *  Identifying and acting on core value    shape the future trajectory of the  Priyanka  Singh,  Siqi  Tang,  Yaro-   apart from supportive policies.  the project.               incentive on electrolyser capex of $54/kW
          drivers  by  determining  where    company.                     slav Verkh, and Han Zhou. They also                                                                            are  welcome  moves  to  help  achieve
          value originates – whether from                                 acknowledge the contribution made by          Refi neries  and  ammonia  production  Economic viability of GH2  targeted LCOH.
          specific industries, regions, or   Scrutinize costs             BCG’s ValueScience Center.                 are expected  to be early  adopters of   LCOH  is  particularly  sensitive  to
          business models – and making     A  successful  value  creation  strategy                                  GH2,  with  potential  for  exporting  green  electrolyser  cost  &  effi ciency  and  re-  CareEdge  Ratings  believes  a  signi-
          informed  decisions  about  divesting   includes ongoing cost scrutiny to   Boston Consulting Group partners   ammonia.  However,  effective  storage  newable  energy  tariff.  CareEdge  Rat-  fi cant  reduction  in  the  capex  cost  of
          non-core assets.               sustain  competitiveness  and  unlock  with  leaders in  business and  society   and  transportation  solutions  for  GH2  ings has outlined various scenarios for  renewable  energy  is  unlikely,  however,
                                         resources for growth.  This can be  to  tackle  their  most  important  chal-   and its derivatives will be essential for  LCOH based on the capex of electro-  there is adequate headroom for the re-
       *  Avoiding  feedstock  dependence.  achieved by:                  lenges and capture their greatest          its wide-scale adoption.          lysers, their effi ciency, and the cost of  duction in the electrolyser cost. Econo-
          Given  the  commercial  advan-                                  opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in                                        renewable  energy. As seen below, the  mies  of  scale,  advancement  in  manu-
          tages some regions enjoy due to  *  Applying  rigorous  zero-based  bud-  business strategy when it was founded   Cost dynamics of GH2 vis-à-vis   horizontal  axis of the table represents  facturing  automation,  the use of less
          feedstock  availability,  companies   geting  principles  and  leveraging  in 1963. Today, we work closely with   alternatives               the capital cost for electrolysers, while  expensive  materials  in  the  stack,  and
          should  be  cautious  about  over   new technologies, such as genera-  clients to embrace a transformational   In contrast to other hydrogen alter-  the  vertical  axis  indicates  renewable  the scaling up of stack sizes shall be the
          investing  in  subsectors  that  are    tive AI, which can act as powerful   approach aimed at benefiting all stake-  natives, i.e., grey hydrogen (produced  energy tariffs.  key drivers for the reduction in the cost
          dependent on specific feedstocks.   tools for reducing costs and   holders – empowering organizations      from natural gas) and brown hydrogen                                of electrolysers going forward.
                                           improving margins.             to grow, build sustainable competitive     (produced  from  coal),  GH2  is  gene-  It is inferred from Figure 1 that
       *  Prioritizing strategic acquisitions                             advantage, and drive positive societal     rated through the electrolysis of water,   LCOH is infl uenced not only by reduc-  Key demand drivers for GH2
          that  enhance  market  reach,  end-  *  Evaluating  asset  networks  and  impact.                          where renewable energy is used to split   tions in electrolyser capex and renew-  The demand drivers for GH2 can be
          industry  coverage,  and  techno   sharing  services,  which  enables                                      water into hydrogen and oxygen, there-  able energy tariffs, but is also sensitive   categorised as:
          logical  innovation  instead  of    companies to reduce unnecessary   Our  diverse,  global  teams  bring   by eliminating CO  emissions.    to  enhancements  in  electrolyser  effi -  *   Near term – Greening the existing
                                                                                                                                    2
          focusing mostly on supply and    structural costs and channel the  deep industry and functional expertise                                    ciency. Considering the waiver of inter-  grey hydrogen users.
          demand-driven M&A.               savings into achieving their growth  and a range of perspectives that ques-  GH2  has  the  potential  to  play  a   state transmission charges, LCOH was   *   Medium term – Wider adoption for
                                           objectives.                    tion the status quo and spark change.      crucial  role  in  achieving  India’s  de-       Levelised Cost of Green Hydrogen ($/kg)
       Optimize capital project management                                BCG delivers solutions through lead-       carbonisation  target  as  well  as  reduc-
          Faced with larger and more com-  Over  the  last  few  years,  success-  ing-edge  management  consulting,   ing India’s dependence on fossil fuels.        $900/kg  $750/kg                  $900/kg  $750/kg
       plex projects, companies need to take  ful chemical players have taken bold  technology and design, and corporate   Nevertheless,  the  estimated  levelised   Rs. 2.19/Kwh  3.12  2.85  Rs. 2.19/Kwh  2.84  2.60
       a more disciplined capital allocation  steps.  They’ve  reworked  strategies,  and  digital  ventures.  We  work  in  a   cost  of  GH2  –  which  includes  both   Rs. 2.43/Kwh  3.28  3.02  Rs. 2.43/Kwh  2.99  2.75
       approach and spend scarce capital on  pressure-tested their global asset net-  uniquely  collaborative  model  across   capital  expenditure  (capex)  and  ope-
       their core competencies and the most  works  and  integrated  value  chains,  the  firm  and  throughout  all  levels  of   rational  expenditure  (opex)  –  per  unit   Rs. 2.67/Kwh  3.45  3.18  Rs. 2.67/Kwh  3.14  2.90
       promising steps in their value chains.  closed  unprofitable  sites,  invested  in  the client organization, fueled by the   of production is currently ~1.75 times
       For example, they should rigorously  regions offering higher growth, dou-  goal of helping our clients thrive and   that of Grey Hydrogen and ~1.50 times   Electrolyser energy consumption: 56 kWh/kg     Electrolyser energy consumption: 51 kWh/kg
       assess  their  integrated  value  chains  bled  down  on  efficiency  measures  enabling them to make the world a    that of Brown Hydrogen. This disparity              Fig. 1: LCOH scenarios
       and consider more flexible partnership   and improved internal processes, and   better place.                 persists despite the waiver of interstate   Source: CareEdge Ratings


       180                                                                 Chemical Weekly  December 17, 2024        Chemical Weekly  December 17, 2024                                                              181


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185