Page 193 - CW E-Magazine (27-2-2024)
P. 193

Special Report


                  Table 3: Concrete resistivity and risk of corrosion     uniform, and stress corrosion crack-
        Concrete resistivity (Ohm.cm)    Risk of corrosion                ing.
        Greater than 20,000              Negligible                          Only a few studies of EN for mea-
        10,000 to 20,000                 Low                              suring corrosion in concrete have been
        5,000 to 10,000                  High                             performed. In general, no distinct bene-
        Less than 5,000                  Very High                        fits of this technique compared to the
                                                                          macro-cell current measurements have
       dependent on  concrete quality and  Electrochemical noise (EN) analysis  been  found.  A  comparison  between
       exposure conditions, such as the rela-  EN analysis is an emerging tech-  some calculated parameters of mea-
       tive humidity. Temperature also affects  nique for monitoring corrosion of  sured EN and the corrosion rate did
       the degree of concrete pore saturation  reinforced  concrete  structures(18).   not, in many case, give clear results.
       and so the resistivity  values(12,13).  It enables information on the mecha-  Neither was correlation between spe-
       Table-3 gives assessment of corrosion  nism and rate of corrosion at areas  cific EN fluctuations and the different
       risk related  to the  value  of concrete   identified  in  concrete  structures.   stages in the corrosion process quite
       resistivity(14).                  A low amplitude variation of the cor-  clear. It was established that due to the
                                         rosion potential of steel in concrete  low electrical conductivity of concrete
       Linear Polarisation Resistance (LPR)   is measured to obtain noise data as a  and lengthy electrodes (rebars) some
       measurements                      record of potential fluctuations in the  electro-magnetic disturbances could
          LPR has become a well-esta-  form  of  power  spectra.  The  sponta-  affect the measured EN signals.
       blished method of determining instan-  neous, random fluctuations in current
       taneous corrosion rate of reinforcing  flow  between  two  identical,  elec-  Embeddable corrosion monitoring
       steel in concrete(15,16).  The tech-  tronically isolated bars in concrete  sensor
       nique is rapid and non-intrusive, re-  coupled through a zero resistance    The embedded corrosion instru-
       quiring only localised damage in the  ammeter are recorded, together with  ment  (ECI) is a sensor that  provides
       concrete cover to enable an electrical  the fluctuations in the potential of one  early warning of conditions that dam-
       connection to be made to the reinforc-  of them, measured against a reference  age steel reinforcement. By  monitor-
       ing steel. The data provides valuable  electrode. The  polarization  resistance   ing  five  key  factors  in  corrosion,  and
       insight into the instantaneous corro-  is given by the following expression:   by communicating these through a
       sion rate of steel reinforcement, giv-  Rp = σ/β.                  digital network, the ECI provides com-
       ing more detailed information than                                 prehensive,  real-time  information on
       a simple potential survey. LPR data   The corrosion rate may be obtained  structural  conditions.  This helps faci-
       enables a more detailed assessment of  from Rp. In addition, the coefficient of  lity managers avert crises, save money
       the structural condition and is a major   variance of the current noise β is said to  on maintenance, and build  a detailed
       tool in deciding upon the optimum  indicate  the  type  of  corrosion,  ranging   record on each structure.
       remedial strategy to be adopted. It is  from 10  for general corrosion to 1.0
                                               -3
       imperative that LPR measurements  for localized corrosion(19). One of
       are accurate. Broad criteria for corro-  the important advantages of this tech-
       sion condition of rebar vs corrosion  nique is  lack  of intrusiveness. Based
       current have been developed from  on the results, it is possible to charac-
       field  and  laboratory  investigations  terise corrosion types such as meta-
       (Table-4)(17).                    stable pitting, pitting  &  crevice,
                   Table 4: Corrosion current vs condition of rebar
        Corrosion current  Corrosion condition of rebar
        (μA/cm2)                                                              Fig. 8: ECI Sensor during operation
        Less than 0.1 to 0.2 Passive condition (no corrosion expected).      The ECI is designed to monitor
        0.2 to 1.0      Low to moderate corrosion (corrosion possible in 10-15 yrs).  bridges, buildings, dams, erosion con-
        1.0 to 10       Moderate to high corrosion (corrosion expected in 2-10 yrs).  trol structures, flood control channels,
                                                                          parking garages, road-ways, spillways,
        More than 10    High corrosion rate (corrosion expected in 2 yrs or less).  etc. It monitors five key factors: linear


       Chemical Weekly  February 27, 2024                                                              193


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198