Page 195 - CW E-Magazine (10-10-2023)
P. 195

Interview



       tic – from an energy content – to derive
       the energy for the process conversion.
       So you lose mass balance there. Then
       you’re producing, let’s say a pyrolysis
       oil or a heavier naphtha-type fraction,
       which is going to yield probably 30-50%
       olefi ns.

          That’s why there’s an advantage of
       being able to take these materials more
       directly to light olefi ns and aromatics.
       Synova is an example of a technology
       to do that, but there are other players
       in the space as well.  The more you  start-up will be shortly thereafter. We’re  They are going to make selective fur-
       can go directly into light products, the  not announcing that date yet, but we’re  nace replacements and this is why the
       lower the energy intensity and asset  taking a staged approach.   We have  technology  has to  be feasible  from a
       complexity, and you can leverage exist-  invested  in two furnace  options, and  retrofi t perspective. While retrofi t capa-
       ing infrastructure, which simplifi es the  the facility has both types, side by side.  bility is critical, also knowing what’s an
       processes.                        That  way we’ll  be able  to make  not  idealized design for a full build is going
                                         just a direct comparison, but also with  to be important as well.
       Mechanical vs chemical recycling –  regard to operability and how the dif-
       your comments?                    ferent components wear through.  The UN is looking at a global treaty
                                                                          for plastic waste. Your comments?
          If I prioritise the pyramid of how to   It’s been an interesting  journey;
       manage recycling, I’d rather mechani-  SABIC had a set of solutions, and   We’re  supportive of the  UN acti-
       cally recycle. I’d rather focus on how to  BASF & Linde had also been develop-  vities.  There are obviously different
       get more high quality pure streams that  ing a different set of solutions. And we  regional  and  country-specifi c  views.
       we  can better mechanically  recycle.  came together with high confi dence that  There are certain positions around
       It has a lower carbon footprint, is more  each of us had the better approach. And  plastic production caps and reducing
       carbon-effi cient,  is  less  wasteful  and  the closer we looked at the data, we saw  production. There are others on how to
       lowers cost. We need to deliver either  the pros and cons of both approaches.  manage recycle rates, how to do invest-
       improved resins that can tolerate more  I think both are likely to show improved  ments upstream, etc.
       recycled content.                 olefi n yields at the cracker and probably
                                         improved long-term performance, but   But, to me, the discussion on caps
          We view chemical  recycling  as a  there could be slight differences. There  doesn’t address the real critical issues,
       big part of the picture because there are  might be a better fi t for retrofi t with one  which  are:  how  do  you  fi x  the  value
       going to be limitations on mechanical  option, versus another in a new build.  chain? How do you address the invest-
       recycling.                        That’s why we felt it was important to  ment  in  waste?  How do you address
                                         de-risk by investing in both at scale.  where  you should  and  shouldn’t  be
          We need to participate  in both of  I don’t think  it’s question  of ‘will  it  using plastics? What are the best opti-
       these equations. But to me, from an  work or won’t’. It’s going to be a ques-  mal uses to decarbonize society? How
       R&D perspective, our biggest place to  tion of subtle performance differences.  do you best standardize,  so that  you
       have an impact is to transform the cost  Linde is prepared to come to the market  can simplify? How do you best move
       and complexity of advanced recycling.  end of the next year with a commercial  to mono-material solutions?  These are
                                         offering.                        the complexities that are being worked
       What are the recent developments on                                through in the process.  We, as  an
       the cracker electrifi cation project?  To really make an impact you need to  industry, have to engage productively
                                         be able to retrofi t?             and see what are the right places to use
          The transformers are now in, and                                plastic; where they’re the best solution;
       mechanical  completion  is due for the   I don’t think anybody’s going to re-  and where they can provide effi ciency
       fourth quarter of this year. Hopefully,  place all their furnaces with e-furnaces.  across the value chain.


       Chemical Weekly  October 10, 2023                                                               195


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200