Page 163 - CW E-Magazine (25-3-2025)

News from Abroad

Bharat Jyoti Impex

AVAILABLE REGULARLY
 Acetophenone  Acetyl Acetone  Acrylonitrile  2-Methyl THF  Methyl Cellosolve  Methyl Cyclohexane
 Adipic Acid  Allyl Alcohol  Allyl Chloride  Allylamine  Methyl Iso Propyl Ketone  Methyl Propyl Ketone
 Alpha-Methyl Styrene  4 Amino Phenol  Amino Ethyl Ethanol Amine  Methyl Salicylate  Methyl Stearate  Methyl Stearate / Palmitate

 Amino Guanidine Bicarbonate  Antimony Trioxide 99.8%  Methyl Tin Mercaptide  Methallyl Chloride  Mono Cyclohexylamine
 Barium Carbonate  Barium Nitrate 99%  1,2,3 Benzotriazole 99.5%  Mono Ethyl Amine 70%  Mono Isopropylamine 70% / 99%
 1,2,3-Benzotriazole  Benzoyl Chloride [99.5%] China  1,3-Butane Diol  Monoglyme  N-Amyl Alcohol (N-Pentyl Alcohol)  N-Butyl Amine
 2 Butyne 1,4 Diol  Biphenyl  Boron Trifluoride Etherate  N-Decanol  N-Hexyl Alcohol (99% & 98%)
 Cerium Oxide  Cesium Carbonate  Cetyl Chloride  N Butyraldehyde  N Ethyl Pyrrolidone  N Vinyl Pyrrolidone
 CIS-2-Butene-1,4-Diol  Crotonic Acid  Cyanuric Chloride  N,N Dimethyl Cyclohexylamine  N,N-Dicyclohexyl Carbodiimide
 Cyclohexanol  Cyclopentanone  Cyclopropylamine  N,O-Bis (Tri Methyl Silyl) Acetamide  NACOL 6 99% (N Hexanol)
 2,2-Dimethoxy Propane  2,4 Di Tertiary Butyl Phenol  NACOL 10-99% (N Decanol) SASOL Germany
 D - Tartaric Acid  D-Camphor Sulphonic Acid  Di Cyclohexylamine  NACOL 8 99% (N Octanol)  Nitro Ethane  Nitro Methane
 Di Ethyl Ketone  Di Ethyl Malonate  Di Ethyl Sulphate  N-Heptane 99%  N-Hexane 99%  N Pentane 95%  N-Pentane 99%
 Di Methyl Acetamide [Henan Junhua]  Di Methyl Malonate  N-Methyl 2 Pyrolidone  N-Methyl Piperazine  1-Octanol (C8)
 Di Phenyl Carbonate  Di Sodium Phosphate Anhydrous  1-Octene  Ortho Chloro Benzaldehyde  Para Benzoquinone
 Dibasic Ester  DIBOC (Di Tert. Butyl Dicarbonate)  Para Cresol  Para Chlorobenzaldehyde
 Dibromomethane (Methylene Di Bromide)  Para Hydroxybenzaldehyde  Perchloric Acid
 Dicyclopentadiene  Di-Ethyl Carbamyl Chloride  Petroleum Ethers 40-60 / 60-80 / 80-100 / 100-120 etc.
 Diethyl Hydroxylamine  Diethyl Oxalate  Diglyme  Phenyl Ethyl Alcohol  Phenyl Ethyl Amine [ R+ ; DL ]
 Diisobutylene  Diisopropyl Succinate  Pivaloyl Chloride  Potassium Bi Carbonate
 Diisopropylamine  Dimethyl Oxalate  Di-N-Propyl Amine  Potassium Tertiary Butoxide  Potassium Thioacetate
Fig. 1: Core elements of LCA for renewable carbon solutions
Source: nova-Institute GmbH  DL Alfa Phenyl Ethyl Amine  DMSO (Hubei Xingfa)  2-Pyrrolidone  Pyrogallol  Quinoline  Resorcinol (China)
 D-Ribose  2 Ethyl Hexyl Bromide  2-Ethylhexyl Thioglycolate
 Salicylic Acid Technical / Pure  Secondary Butanol (China)
(for elements depicted in Figure-1) of  Areas of divergence: On the other  Biogenic carbon accounting should  Ethyl Benzene  Ethyl Cyclo Hexane  Ethyl Nicotinate  Sodium Diethyldithiocarbamate
guidelines, as well as the implications hand, the analysed frameworks enable -1/+1: When it comes to  Ethylene Glycol Diacetate (EGDA)  Fluorobenzene  Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate (56%) Granule  Sodium Ethoxide
of these methodological aspects on the differ regarding the provisions biogenic carbon accounting, almost  Formamide  Formic Acid 99%  Fumaric Acid  Sodium Ethoxide solution in Ethanol / Methanol
LCA outcomes. In report-2 a special for processes with multiple out- all frameworks require to use the  Furfuraldehyde  Furfuryl Alcohol  Furfurylamine  Sodium Methoxide  Sodium Sulphite (Aditya Birla -Thailand)
focus is given to renewable carbon puts and the question whether the -1/+1-approach, where biogenic  Gamma Amino Butyric Acid (4 Amino Butyric Acid)  Sodium Sulphite 98%  Sodium Sulphite Tech 90%
 Sodium Tertiary Butoxide  Sorbitol Powder  Stearyl Bromide
 Gamma Butyrolactone  Glutaraldehyde 50%  Glycine
in recycling situations and challenges avoided production of co-products CO uptake is modelled as negative  Glyoxal 40%  Glycolic Acid 70%  Glyoxylic Acid 50%  Stearyl Palmitate  Strontium Carbonate  Succinic Acid
2
for LCA and carbon footprint studies. can be taken into account with a GHG emissions and biogenic CO  Guanidine HCl  Guanidine Carbonate  Guanidine Thiocyanate  Succinic Anhydride  Sulfolane Anhydrous
2
Report-3, a non-technical summary credit (system expansion with sub- emissions are modelled as (posi-  Guanine  Heptane [mix]  12 Hydroxy Stearic Acid  Tert. Butyl Amine  Tertiary Amyl Alcohol
highlights the main insights of the pro- stitution). The provisions range tive) GHG emissions. Only PEF  1,6-Hexane Diol  Hippuric Acid  Imidazole  Isobutylamine  Tertiary Butyl Acetate  Tetra Hydro Furfuryl Alcohol
ject results and states key take-aways from only vague requirements for and RED III use the 0/0- (or net  Isovaleraldehyde  Itaconic Acid  L + Tartaric Acid  THF (Dairen, Nan Ya)  Thioacetamide
 Lauric / Myristic / Palmitic / Oleic / DCFA / Caprylic Acid
 Thiocyanates: Ammonium / Sodium / Potassium
for policy-makers. the application of substitution, to zero-) approach, where any bio-  Lactic Acid  Lanthanum Carbonate  Lithium Aluminium Hydride  Thioglycolic Acid 80%  TMOF / TEOF / TMO Acetate
strict requirements, to a complete genic removal and emission count  Lithium Amide  Lithium Carbonate [Equivalent to I.P.]  Tolyl Triazole  Tolyltriazole Granular
The study shows both alignment prohibition of substitution in the towards the GHG emissions with  Lithium Carbonate  Lithium Hydroxide Anhydrous  1,2,4-Triazole & its Sodium Salt  2,2,2 Tri Fluoro Ethanol
and notable differences between carbon footprint result. 0, although it should be noted that  Lithium Hydroxide  Lithium Hydroxide Monohydrate LIOH : 57.7% Min  2,2,2-Tri Fluoro Ethylene  Tri Ethyl Citrate
frameworks – the assessed frameworks  Policy-makers should recognise a change from 0/0 to -1/+1 is being  Lithium Metal 99% / 99.9%  L-Proline  M. P. Diol  Tri Fluoro Acetic Acid  Tri Fluoro Acetic Anhydride
 Tri Isodecyl Stearate  Triacetin (Glycerine Triacetate)
 Malonic Acid  Malononitrile  Maltol  Meta Cresol 99.5%
agree on methodological approach of the documented methodological discussed in the EF Technical  Meta Hydroxy Benzoic Acid  Meta Para Cresol [Meta 60%]  Trichloroisocyanuric Acid 5-8 Mesh,100-120 Mesh
many aspects, but there are also some fl exibility in LCA frameworks to Advisory Board.  1 Methoxy Propanol  1-Methoxy Propyl Acetate  Triethyl Ortho Acetate  Triethylsilane  Triisobutyl Phosphate
critical differences: help ensure a level playing fi eld for  Further clarifi cations needed: Seve-  1-Methyl Imidazole  2-Methyl Imidazole  Triss Buffer  Tri-N-Butyl Phosphate  Triphosgene  2,6-Xylidine
 Consensus areas: Most frameworks renewable carbon compared to fossil ral methodological aspects should AVAILABLE REGULARLY AT A SPECIAL RATE
agree on the method to assess the carbon sources. While the analysed be further discussed and clarifi ed, • Azelaic Acid • Caproic Acid • Methyl Iso Butyl Carbinol [MIBC]
impacts of biogenic carbon uptake frameworks have different levels best case through involvement • Methyl Glycol • Phosphorous Pentoxide • Di Iso Butyl Ketone [DIBK]
and emissions (except for PEF and of fl exibility, LCA results can vary of relevant stakeholders from the • Pelargonic Acid • Potassium Ter Sulphate
RED). While the specifi c provisions strongly even within calculation LCA community, industry, policy- Bharat Jyoti Impex
regarding recycling differ, all of the results under the same framework. makers (JRC), etc. This applies “Jasu”, Ground Floor, 30, Dadabhai Road, (Near CNM School), Vile Parle (West), Mumbai 400 056.
analysed frameworks leave multiple Simply following a certain frame- especially for Mass Balance and Phone: +91 91528 33394 & +91 91524 33394  Whats App:. +91 99300 51288
options available so that the variety work does not guarantee that LCA Attribution and carbon capture and Email: info@bharatjyotiimpex.com  Website: www.bharatjyotiimpex.com
of results is large for each of them. results are comparable. utilisation (CCU). More than 2000 CheMiCals in sMall PaCking

162 Chemical Weekly March 25, 2025 Chemical Weekly March 25, 2025 163

Contents Index to Advertisers Index to Products Advertised