Page 184 - CW E-Magazine (4-3-2025)
P. 184

Special Report




       Tariffs & pharma: What may be next?


            he pharma industry weighs in    Tariffs  imposed  on  United  States   PATRICIA VAN ARNUM
            on the impact that US-imposed   products;
       Ttariffs would have on products,    Unfair, discriminatory, or extraterri-  Editorial Director, (DCAT)
       manufacturing, and supply chains, parti-  torial taxes imposed by US trading  trading partners. Upon completion of
       cularly for generic drugs.  With much   partners on US businesses, workers,  this evaluation, they are to provide a
       uncertainty looming on how trade policy   and  consumers,  including  a  value-  report  to  the  President  detailing  pro-
       has and will evolve  under a new US   added tax;                   posed remedies in pursuit of reciprocal
       Administration, what is the latest?    Costs  to  US  businesses,  workers,  trade relations with each trading part-
                                           and  consumers  arising  from  non-  ner. In turn, the Director of the Offi ce
       The latest turn: reciprocal tariffs  tariff barriers or measures and unfair  of Management and Budget is directed
          The US position on trade, particu-  or  harmful  acts,  policies,  or  prac-  to evaluate within 180 days the fi scal
       larly tariffs, has seen several moves by   tices, including subsidies, and bur-  impacts on the federal government and
       the  new  Administration  under  Presi-  densome  regulatory  requirements  the public and deliver that assessment
       dent Donald Trump since taking offi ce   on US businesses operating in other  to the President.
       on January 20, 2025. On February 13,   countries;
       the trade picture took another turn with    Policies  and  practices  that  cause  Global reactions
       President Trump signing a Presidential   exchange rates to deviate from their   The news of US-imposed reciprocal
       Memorandum  ordering  the  develop-  market  value,  wage  suppression;  taxes was met with criticism from the
       ment  of  plan  to  evaluate  tariff  levels   and  other  policies  that  reduce  US   European Union (EU), which is one of
       between the US and its trading partners as   competitiveness; and   the largest trading partners of the US,
       well as to evaluate other trade barriers    Other practice that, in the judgment  including  for  pharmaceuticals.  “The
       and  practices  by  US  trading  partner.   of  the  United  States  Trade  Repre-  European Commission views President
       Called the “Fair and Reciprocal Plan,”   sentative  (USTR),  in  consultation  Trump’s  proposed  “reciprocal”  trade
       which  seeks  to  reduce  the  US  trade   with the Secretary of the Treasury,  policy  as  a  step  in  the  wrong  direc-
       defi cit.                            the  Secretary  of  Commerce,  and  tion,”  said  the  European  Commission
                                           the  Senior  Counselor  to  the  Presi-  in a February 14, 2025, statement. “The
          “This  lack  of  reciprocity  is  one   dent for Trade and Manufacturing,  EU remains committed to an open and
       source  of  America’s  large  and  per-  imposes  any  unfair  limitation  on  predictable  global  trading  system  that
       sistent  annual  trade  defi cit  in  goods:   market  access  or  any  structural  benefi ts all partners. The EU maintains
       closed  markets  abroad  reduce  U.S.   impediment to fair competition with  some of the lowest tariffs in the world
       exports and open markets at home result   the market economy of the US.  and sees no justifi cation for increased
       in  signifi cant  imports,  both  of  which                         US tariffs on its exports…The EU will
       undercut  American  competitiveness,”   Following that evaluation, the US  react  fi rmly  and  immediately  against
       said the White House in a February 13,  Secretary of Commerce and the USTR,  unjustifi ed  barriers  to  free  and  fair
       2025  statement.  “….Reciprocal  tariffs  in consultation with the US Secretary  trade, including when tariffs are used to
       will  bring  back  fairness  and  prospe-  of  the  Treasury,  the  US  Secretary  of  challenge legal and non-discriminatory
       rity..”                           Homeland  Security,  the  Assistant  to  policies.”
                                         the  President  for  Economic  Policy,
          Under the plan, the US government  the Senior Counselor to the President   The  US  goods  trade  (exports  plus
       will fi rst evaluate and then work to coun-  for Trade and Manufacturing, and the  imports) with the EU totalled $975.9-bn
       ter  non-reciprocal  trading  arrangements  heads of such other executive depart-  in  2024,  according  to  data  from  the
       with  trading  partners  by  determining  ments and agencies as the US Secre-  Offi ce  of  the  USTR.  Goods  exports
       the  equivalent  of  a  reciprocal  tariff  tary of Commerce and the USTR deem  totalled  $370.2-bn;  goods  imports
       with  respect  to  each  foreign  trading  relevant,  are  authorized  to  initiate  totalled $605.8-bn. The US goods trade
       partner.  The approach would examine  under  respective  legal  authorities,  all  defi cit  with  the  EU  was  $235.6-bn
       non-reciprocal   trade   relationships  necessary actions to investigate these  in 2024.
       with all US trading partners. It would  practices  from  any  non-reciprocal
       include evaluating the following:  trade  arrangements  adopted  by  any   The US is the EU’s largest trading


       184                                                                     Chemical Weekly  March 4, 2025


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189