Page 191 - CW E-Magazine (8-4-2025)
P. 191

Special Report                                                                   Special Report



 Process safety and risk management (Part 4):   Table 2: Ready reckoner for taking PHA decisions
        Phase/Stage of PHA                          What-if      FMEA         HAZOP       FTA      QRA
 Process Hazards Analysis and Facility Siting  Project  Development  checklist
                                                       X
                                    of basic data
 There’s an old saying that if you   To  identify  all  recognized  and   Pre-authori-  X  O  O

 think safety is expensive, try an   unrecognized hazardous events;  JOY M. SHAH  sation
 “ accident.  Accidents cost a lot   To identify hazardous materials and   Founder and Chief Consultant  Design  X  O  O  O  O

 Innov8 ProTech Solutions
 of money. And, not only in damage to   hazardous processes;  Former Sr. Vice President – Technical   Baseline PHA of new facility  X  O  O  O  O
 plant and in claims for injury, but also   To provide  framework  for under-  Reliance Industries Ltd.  Cyclic PHA of existing facility  X  O  O  O

 in the loss of the company’s reputa-  standing  the  hazardous  events  and   E-mail: joymshah@gmail.com  Process Changes/MOC  X  O  O  O
 tion.”– Dr. Trevor Kletz  responses to them;  Decommissioning and mothballing  X
    To work out actions to eliminate   PHA is also carried out for existing   (X) denotes minimum requirement; (O) depicts optional method.
 Process  Safety  and  Risk  Manage-  and/or  reduce risks  involved with  facilities:  once in fi ve years in medium hazards
 ment is a comprehensive  approach   hazards;    Cyclic analysis, for which the   facilities, and once in 10 years in low
 for goal zero incident, zero injury and   To understand consequences or   frequency depends on hazards;  hazards facilities.

 zero environmental release. In previous   impact on other PSM elements;     Revalidation  of previous review
 three notes, I have discussed on lead-     To seek to achieve a multi-disciplined   depending on hazards of operation;   Methodology for PHA
 ership aspects of Process Safety and   consensus on hazard control; and  and  There  are  many  methodologies
 Risk Management. In next three notes,   To document results for future use.     Technology and facilities changes.  for  conducting  PHA.  They  can  be

 I shall discuss on three most important   either qualitative or quantitative. They
 elements related to chemical engineers:  PHA is carried out for new process   PHA is also important to sup-  can be used alone or in combination,
 1.  Process  hazards analysis and faci  and facilities with several reviews  port incident investigation and dur-  depending on requirement. Some of
 lity siting;  during different stages of development  ing  decommissioning,  mothballing   the popular methods are listed in
 2.  Incident investigation and learning  including:  and/or dismantling of process faci-  Table 1.
 from incident; and     Screening in early development stage;  lities.
 3.  Risk  management  for  sustainable   Design review at design completion;  Based on  my experience, 95-97%

 operation.     Final project safety report, before   Apart from initial base line PHA,   of  hazardous  events  can  be  identifi ed
 start-up; and  the recommended best practice  is to   by  What  If/Checklist  and/or  HAZOP,
 There are few other aspects of   Baseline PHA,  after any start-up  carry out cyclic PHA at least once in   3-5% require FMEA, and <1% require

 execution  part  related  to  chemical  engi-  changes.  three  years  for  high-hazards  facilities,   FTA or QRA.
 neers: Pre-start up safety audit; Process   Table 1: Methodologies to conduct PHA
 technology information, operating pro-  Qualitative techniques  Quantitative techniques  One question that often comes up
 cedures; and Management of Change.   is: ‘Which method need to be applied?’
 What If/Checklist  Uses “what if”   Fault Tree Analysis  Quantitative  In general, What-if method is the mini-  Fig. 1. depicts the hierarchy of hazards controls. PHA is also expected to address the hazards
 This note addresses the aspects of   questions to evaluate  (FTA)  method to deter-  mum requirement and can be applied   controls in the safe order.
 Process Hazards  Analysis  (PHA) and   effect of occurrences   mine probability  to all types of PHA, i.e., whether it is  Facility siting  which is based on occupancy and func-
 Facility Siting.  on people/things  of an undesired  project phase,  baseline  PHA, cyclic   Facility  siting  is  a  very  intensive  tions, temporary & permanent, and criti-
 outside the process   “top event”  PHA or PHA for process change or PHA  process that aims to minimize hazards  cality,  (e.g.,  emergency  response  cen-
 Process Hazards Analysis (PHA)  Hazard and   Guide-word driven  Quantitative Risk  Quantitative  for decommissioning. For cyclic PHA,  to human life as well as ensure avail-  ter, fi re water, breathing air, safe-haven
 PHA is a method to identify, evalu-  Operability Study  review of hazards,  Analysis (QRA)  method to deter-  HAZOP  or  FMEA  are  most  desirable  ability of critical staff and assets in  requirement etc.)
 ate, as well as develop methods  to   (HAZOP)  its consequences   mine extent of   methods. FTA or QRA is applicable for  case of emergency. It involves several
 control the hazards in the process unit.   and mitigation plan  risk to plant per-  very high hazards facilities, e.g., storage  steps.  Step  3  is  consequence  screening
 It  includes  hazard  identifi cation,  con-  sonnel, as well as   and  usage  of  large  quantity  of  highly   by site-specifi c screening by building
 to nearby
 sequence analysis, hazard evaluation,   community.  toxic material or a hazardous facility in   Step  1  is  initial  hazard  screening  design, usage and spacing criteria.
 human factors, facility siting & inher-  centre of local civil bodies, etc. (Table 2).  based on history of incidents, MSDS of
 ently safer process evaluation.  Failure Mode and  Identifi es failure  The completed PHA is used to follow-up  chemicals handled, process conditions,   Step  4  is  risk  screening  by  quali-
  Effect Analysis  modes of equip-  accepted recommendations and to com-  inventory of chemicals, as well as PHA  tative/quantitative risk assessment
 For every hazardous manufacturing   (FMEA)  ment and  develops   municate  to  affected  personnel  regard-  recommendations.  using the formula: Risk = Frequency
 facility, PHA is important aspect with   risk estimate for  ing  the  hazards  involved  in  facility  as   (Events/yr) x Consequence (Fatalities/
 prioritizing action
 following objectives:  well as to mitigate hazards.  Step 2 is initial building screening,  Event).

 190  Chemical Weekly  April 8, 2025  Chemical Weekly  April 8, 2025                                   191


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196