Page 190 - CW E-Magazine (8-4-2025)
P. 190

Special Report                                                                                                                                                                   Special Report



       Process safety and risk management (Part 4):                                                                                              Table 2: Ready reckoner for taking PHA decisions
                                                                                                                      Phase/Stage of PHA                           What-if      FMEA         HAZOP       FTA     QRA
       Process Hazards Analysis and Facility Siting                                                                   Project                     Development      checklist
                                                                                                                                                                     X
                                                                                                                                                  of basic data
            There’s an old saying that if you   To  identify  all  recognized  and                                                               Pre-authori-       X                         O          O

            think safety is expensive, try an   unrecognized hazardous events;  JOY M. SHAH                                                       sation
       “ accident.  Accidents cost a lot   To identify hazardous materials and   Founder and Chief Consultant                                    Design             X            O            O          O        O

                                                                           Innov8 ProTech Solutions
       of money. And, not only in damage to   hazardous processes;         Former Sr. Vice President – Technical      Baseline PHA of new facility                   X            O            O          O        O
       plant and in claims for injury, but also   To provide  framework  for under-  Reliance Industries Ltd.        Cyclic PHA of existing facility                X            O            O          O

       in the loss of the company’s reputa-  standing  the  hazardous  events  and   E-mail: joymshah@gmail.com       Process Changes/MOC                            X            O            O          O
       tion.”– Dr. Trevor Kletz            responses to them;                                                         Decommissioning and mothballing                X
                                            To work out actions to eliminate   PHA is also carried out for existing   (X) denotes minimum requirement; (O) depicts optional method.
          Process  Safety  and  Risk  Manage-  and/or  reduce risks  involved with  facilities:                      once in fi ve years in medium hazards
       ment is a comprehensive  approach   hazards;                         Cyclic analysis, for which the          facilities, and once in 10 years in low
       for goal zero incident, zero injury and   To understand consequences or   frequency depends on hazards;      hazards facilities.

       zero environmental release. In previous   impact on other PSM elements;     Revalidation  of previous review
       three notes, I have discussed on lead-     To seek to achieve a multi-disciplined   depending on hazards of operation;   Methodology for PHA
       ership aspects of Process Safety and   consensus on hazard control; and  and                                     There  are  many  methodologies
       Risk Management. In next three notes,   To document results for future use.     Technology and facilities changes.  for  conducting  PHA.  They  can  be

       I shall discuss on three most important                                                                       either qualitative or quantitative. They
       elements related to chemical engineers:  PHA is carried out for new process   PHA is also important to sup-   can be used alone or in combination,
       1.  Process  hazards analysis and faci  and facilities with several reviews  port incident investigation and dur-  depending on requirement. Some of
          lity siting;                   during different stages of development  ing  decommissioning,  mothballing   the popular methods are listed in
       2.  Incident investigation and learning  including:                and/or dismantling of process faci-        Table 1.
          from incident; and                Screening in early development stage;  lities.
       3.  Risk  management  for  sustainable   Design review at design completion;                                    Based on  my experience, 95-97%

          operation.                        Final project safety report, before   Apart from initial base line PHA,   of  hazardous  events  can  be  identifi ed
                                           start-up; and                  the recommended best practice  is to       by  What  If/Checklist  and/or  HAZOP,
          There are few other aspects of   Baseline PHA,  after any start-up  carry out cyclic PHA at least once in   3-5% require FMEA, and <1% require

       execution  part  related  to  chemical  engi-  changes.            three  years  for  high-hazards  facilities,   FTA or QRA.
       neers: Pre-start up safety audit; Process        Table 1: Methodologies to conduct PHA
       technology information, operating pro-    Qualitative techniques          Quantitative techniques                One question that often comes up
       cedures; and Management of Change.                                                                            is: ‘Which method need to be applied?’
                                         What If/Checklist  Uses “what if”   Fault Tree Analysis  Quantitative       In general, What-if method is the mini-  Fig. 1. depicts the hierarchy of hazards controls. PHA is also expected to address the hazards
          This note addresses the aspects of              questions to evaluate  (FTA)      method to deter-         mum requirement and can be applied                        controls in the safe order.
       Process Hazards  Analysis  (PHA) and               effect of occurrences             mine probability         to all types of PHA, i.e., whether it is  Facility siting           which is based on occupancy and func-
       Facility Siting.                                   on people/things                  of an undesired          project phase,  baseline  PHA, cyclic   Facility  siting  is  a  very  intensive  tions, temporary & permanent, and criti-
                                                          outside the process                “top event”             PHA or PHA for process change or PHA  process that aims to minimize hazards  cality,  (e.g.,  emergency  response  cen-
       Process Hazards Analysis (PHA)    Hazard and       Guide-word driven  Quantitative Risk  Quantitative         for decommissioning. For cyclic PHA,  to human life as well as ensure avail-  ter, fi re water, breathing air, safe-haven
          PHA is a method to identify, evalu-  Operability Study  review of hazards,  Analysis (QRA)  method to deter-  HAZOP  or  FMEA  are  most  desirable  ability of critical staff and assets in  requirement etc.)
       ate, as well as develop methods  to   (HAZOP)      its consequences                  mine extent of           methods. FTA or QRA is applicable for  case of emergency. It involves several
       control the hazards in the process unit.           and mitigation plan               risk to plant per-       very high hazards facilities, e.g., storage  steps.                    Step  3  is  consequence  screening
       It  includes  hazard  identifi cation,  con-                                          sonnel, as well as       and  usage  of  large  quantity  of  highly                         by site-specifi c screening by building
                                                                                            to nearby
       sequence analysis, hazard evaluation,                                                community.               toxic material or a hazardous facility in   Step  1  is  initial  hazard  screening  design, usage and spacing criteria.
       human factors, facility siting & inher-                                                                       centre of local civil bodies, etc. (Table 2).  based on history of incidents, MSDS of
       ently safer process evaluation.   Failure Mode and  Identifi es failure                                        The completed PHA is used to follow-up  chemicals handled, process conditions,   Step  4  is  risk  screening  by  quali-
                                          Effect Analysis  modes of equip-                                           accepted recommendations and to com-  inventory of chemicals, as well as PHA  tative/quantitative risk assessment
          For every hazardous manufacturing   (FMEA)      ment and  develops                                         municate  to  affected  personnel  regard-  recommendations.        using the formula: Risk = Frequency
       facility, PHA is important aspect with             risk estimate for                                          ing  the  hazards  involved  in  facility  as                       (Events/yr) x Consequence (Fatalities/
                                                          prioritizing action
       following objectives:                                                                                         well as to mitigate hazards.         Step 2 is initial building screening,  Event).

       190                                                                       Chemical Weekly  April 8, 2025      Chemical Weekly  April 8, 2025                                                                  191


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195