Page 181 - CW E-Magazine (7-11-2023)
P. 181

Special Report


       580 tubes, out of which 400 were of
       titanium and the remaining 180 were of
       Cu-Ni. The operating temperature and
       pressure of phenol on the tube side was
       140-150°C and 15 kgs/cm  respectively.
                           2
       The cooling  salt water pressure was
       about 5 kgs/cm  and velocity of water
                   2
       was about 6 ft/s in the shell side.

          A standby phenol cooler (E-202B)
       of the same size as that of E-202 A had
       to be commissioned in 2010 for avoid-  Fig. 7: Fouling of the Tube bundle with   Fig. 8: Denickelification & Pitting below
       ing refinery shut-down and high down-      foreign materials                   plastic sheets
       time and maintenance cost. The mate-      Denickelification  was  observed  on   extra spaces, and increased trans-
       rial of the tube bundle was again Cu-Ni   most of the tubes, as indicated by   portation and installation costs.
       (70-30 type), as in the earlier unit. But   the reddish colour in Figure-8.  2.  Energy costs: Costs for extra fuel
       the cooling salt water in this standby    Most of the pits and leaks were in   required if fouling leads to extra

       cooler was in the tube side and phenol   9 ‘O’clock to 3 ‘O’ clock position;   fuel burning in the heat exchanger
       was in the shell side. In this cooler the   where settling of foreign materials   to overcome the effect of fouling.
       first leak appeared after a trouble-free   could take place easily.  3.  Maintenance  costs: Costs for
       operation of 3 years and afterwards it    The cooling salt water was found to   removal of fouling deposits, costs

       leaked thrice in a span of 6 years, mak-  be having 0.2 to 0.25 ppm of dis-  for chemicals  or other  operating
       ing the total plugged tubes to 14  out   solved sulphides.             costs for antifoaming devices.
       of 580 tubes. The original tube bundle    No sign of galvanic corrosion on the  4.  Cost  of  production  loss: Planned

       operated for about 8 years and was   tube bundle was  observed, though   or un-planned plant shutdowns due
       changed in 2018.                    the bundle consisted of 70% tita-  to fouling in the heat exchangers
                                           nium tubes and 30% Cu-Ni tubes.    can cause large production losses.
       Observations                                                           These losses are often considered
          The following  observations were   All the above observations revealed   to be the main cost of fouling and
       made on the bimetallic  tube bundle  that the premature failure of cupronickel    very difficult to estimate.
       (comprising of titanium and cupronickel   (70-30 type) tubes was mainly due to  5.  Extra  environmental  management
       tubes) of  the phenol cooler E-202 A,  ‘crevice’  and  ‘denickelification’  cor-  cost: This the cost incurred by the
       which leaked within 28 days of opera-  rosion mechanisms. Crevice corrosion   industry to dispose large amount of
       tion:                             (pitting) was accelerated by deposition   chemicals/additives used for foul-
           The corrosion of Cu-Ni was mainly  of plastic  strips, wooden pieces, silt,   ing mitigation.
          due to the cooling salt water rather  and foreign material, etc., and dezinci-
          than phenol.                   fication  was  caused  by  dissolved  sul-  Huge fouling costs are reported in
           The leaking tubes were having deep  phides present in the seawater.   different countries and are reported
          pits throughout the  length  of the                             as percentage  of their  Gross National
          tube.                          Cost implications of fouling     Product (GNP).  Average  fouling  cost
           Fouling of the bundle with plastic   Reliable knowledge of fouling eco-  in a country is about 0.20% of its
          strips, wooden pieces, silt and other  nomics is desirable in order to evaluate  GNP, varying from 0.15% to 0.28%, in
          foreign  materials was observed as  the  cost  efficiency  of  various  fouling   Australia and USA respectively. Such
          (Figure-7 and Figure-8).       mitigation  strategies that can be   studies have not been conducted in
           Accumulation  of fouling materials  adopted for the heat exchangers.  The  India;  however  significant  costs  are
          was high at baffle supporting plates  total fouling-related costs  involve the  incurred  due to fouling of heat
          of the tube bundle (Figure-8).  following:                      exchangers in our country also.
           Pits as deep as 1-mm was observed  1.  Capital expenditure: Excessive sur-
          on almost all  the  tubes,  below  the   face area required to overcome the  CONClUsION
          plastic  strips that were wrapped   heavy fouling condition, costs for   Fouling in heat exchangers is a very
          round the tubes.                  stronger foundation, provision for  typical, common  and  generally inevi-


       Chemical Weekly  November 7, 2023                                                               181


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186