Page 131 - CW E-Magazine (19-9-2023)
P. 131

Point of View




       Plastics waste problems gets attention of the G20

          The issue of plastics waste has attracted a lot of attention for some years now – from civil society, regulators, governments,
       environmentalists and businesses. There is wide recognition that this is a problem that cannot be wished away, and the longer the delay in
       aggressively tackling the issue, the larger it gets. Multilateral agencies, including the United Nations, have also taken cognisance of the crises
       and a global pact to tackle the issue is now in discussion. Now the recently concluded G20 summit has weighed in on the issue, lending its
       support to the initiative.

          In its ‘Green Development Pact for a Sustainable Future’ – part of the G20 New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration – the major economies of the
       world have agreed to a formulate a pathway to end plastic pollution by endorsing, in particular, the ongoing efforts at the UN. The statement
       of affirmation reads as: “We are determined to end plastic pollution. In this context, we welcome the resolution UNEP/EA.5/Res.14, which
       established an Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including
       the marine environment, with the ambition of completing its work by the end of 2024. We will also build on the G20 Marine Litter Action Plan
       as elucidated in the Osaka Blue Ocean Vision.”

          With India’s dogged persistence framing the consensus, this represents a strong commitment from the government – one that plastic
       manufacturers and consumers alike will have to take cognisance.

       The magnitude of the problem
          In some sense, plastics are a victim of their success. Since the vast majority are produced from petroleum, they have a hefty carbon
       footprint that modern society is increasingly uncomfortable with. The material contributes to about 3.4% of global greenhouse gas emissions
       throughout their lifecycle, with the bulk coming from their production from fossil fuels (oil, natural gas and coal, in order of importance) in the
       petrochemical industry.

          But the more worrying aspect of plastics is their fate after useful life. How big of a problem this is can be judged by some numbers. Annual
       production of plastics has more than doubled in the last 20 years – from 234-mt in 2000 to 460-mt in 2019. But just ~9% of plastic waste
       generated in 2019 was recycled, even as 19% was incinerated, almost 50% went into landfills and 22% was disposed of in uncontrolled
       dumpsites, burnt in open pits, or leaked into the environment. According to estimates made in a report by the OECD (Global Plastics Outlook:
       Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options), about 22-mt of plastic materials leaked into the environment in 2019, of which
       6.1-mt went into rivers, lakes and oceans. The vast majority of the leaked waste were macro-plastics and happened due to inadequate collection
       and disposal infrastructure. Though the quantum of micro-plastics (polymers having a diameter smaller than 5-mm) represented only 12% of all
       plastic waste that went uncontrolled into the environment, little is still known about its fate, for example, in marine ecosystems, and its impact,
       some believe, could be disproportionately larger. Air-borne microplastics have also been found even in remotest parts of the world, including
       the Arctic, where they may contribute to accelerated warming.
          COVID-19 magnified both the benefits and the problems with plastics. While the material was invaluable in tackling the health emergency
       (e.g., through the use of personal protection equipment, PPE), the quantum of waste generated increased due to their one-time-use and of
       other medical disposables (e.g., syringes for vaccinations). The astonishing rise in e-commerce to circumvent tedious (and risky) travel to stores
       also contributed to a steep rise in packaging wastes, much of which was paper and plastic. This when overall plastics consumption fell – by
       roughly 2% globally in 2020 over the previous year – due to the substantial decrease in economic activity.

          Given that this mismanagement has been going on for decades, it is no surprise that the cumulative build-up has reached astonishing
       levels – 109-mt in rivers and 30-mt in the oceans, as per the OECD. Tackling this accumulated inventory is technically challenging and
       expensive, making it imperative that further inflows are first minimised and eventually eliminated.

       Fundamental redesign and innovation needed
          While the average lifetime of plastic products is almost ten years, there is wide variation. For example, while packaging applications
       are short-lived, use in construction typically last several decades. Overall, almost two-third of all plastic waste comes from applications with
       lifespans of less than five years: packaging (40%), consumer products (12%) and textiles (11%).

          If the bull is to be taken by its horns, attention needs to be first on plastic packaging. Most packaging are, by design, destined for
       landfill, incineration or energy recovery, and are likely to leak into the environment after a short single use. The problem is particularly



       Chemical Weekly  September 19, 2023                                                             131


                                      Content    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136